ALARP means – “as Low as reasonably practicable”.
It is also represented as ALARA – “as low as reasonably achievable”, and
As SFAIRP – “so far as is reasonably practicable”.
ALARP arises from UK legislation, particularly the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974; it has a wider use than ALARA which is used in USA and SFAIRP which is used both in UK and New Zealand.
These acronyms are used in connection with the management and regulation of safety systems and serve as in guide for risk management.
Application of ALARP
Making sure a risk has been reduced ALARP is about weighing the risk against the sacrifice needed to further reduce it.
See ALARP guidance here
It must be possible to demonstrate that the cost involved in reducing the risk further would be grossly disproportionate to the benefit gained. This principle arises from the fact that infinite time, effort and money could be spent in the attempt of reducing a risk to zero.
To spend $1m to prevent ten (10) staff suffering bruised elbow is obviously grossly disproportionate; but to spend $1m to prevent a major gas explosion capable of killing three hundred (300) people is obviously proportionate.
Factors to be considered when deciding whether or not a risk has been reduced as far as reasonably practical:
- Health and safety guidelines and codes of practice.
- Manufacturer’s specifications and recommendations.
- Industry practice
- International standards and laws
Suggestions from advisory bodies.
- Comparison with similar hazardous events in other industries.
- Cost of further measures would be disproportionate to the risk reduction they would achieve.
Limitations of ALARP
The major limitation in this analysis is that risk and sacrifice are not usually measured in the same units, so it’s a bit like comparing two very different things; e.g, apples and pears.
The proposed solution to this limitation is to adopt the CBA (Cost Benefit Analysis). In CBA both risk and sacrifice are converted to a common set of units – MONEY, making it possible for them to be compared.
The carrot diagram
The carrot diagram is used to explain “as low as reasonably practicable”. It has a wider top part termed – unacceptable region and the thin base termed – acceptable region.
The region in-between the top and base is mostly recognized as the “as low as reasonably practicable region”.
This expression has been said to be misleading, since there is no legal requirement for risks to be tolerable, nor any recognition that low risks may be regarded as broadly acceptable.
However, to determine what is tolerable/acceptable, duty holders (Policy makers and those engaged in program delivery, Enforcers, and Technical specialists) must exercise judgement, referring to existing good practice that has been established by a process of discussion with stakeholders to achieve a consensus about what is ALARP.
Read Also: Risk Analysis in HSE
For questions and contributions, please contact us via our contact page or comment box.
Do well to share this article after reading.